Sears Holdings (SHLD) 2Q06 earnings for the quarter ending July 30, 2005 disappointed investors leading to a decline of 5.2% in the shares on Thursday. To get a sense of what the Street was expecting please take a look at my preview note posted yesterday.
The main disappointment in the quarter was on the top line where the company reported $13.1 billion against a consensus of $13.7 billion. The culprit in the quarter was the old Sears stores which had a same stores sales decline of over 7% despite an easy comparison. The old Kmart stores actually performed OK with same store sales declining just 0.3%….

….Management attributed the weak sales at Sears to a decreased and different approach to promotions and a reduction in inventory. I have to believe that sales were worse than internal budgets but it is worth noting that despite the lower sales, gross margins at Sears expanded sharply from 26.7% to 29.4%. This suggests there is a strategy in place designed to boost profitability and cash flow at the expense of sales. However, as the Kmart results discussed below make clear, there is only so much room for sales declines before gains in profitability are overwhelmed. Sales were weak across all categories at Sears with apparel the worst and hardlines, including appliances, faring the best.
Another disappointment at Sears was lack of SG&A leverage. SG&A as a % of sales was 23.4%, down just 10 basis points against year ago levels. Cost savings are a key aspect of the investment story for SHLD and this quarter was supposed to show more operating leverage. Is it the lousy sales? Is it poor management? I’m not sure but I still think the cost savings will come and here is why: in the latest quarter, Kmart had SG&A as a % of sales of 20.6% almost 300 basis points less than Sears. The two retailers aren’t identical but this gives some sense of the cost savings potential that can drive earnings and cash flow for SHLD in the next few years given the revenue base at Sears exceeds $30 billion annually.
One thing completely overlooked in the reporting so far on SHLD is that despite the sales shortfall and less than expected SG&A savings, Sears still reported an increase in EBITDA of almost $200 million to $439 million against $242 million a year ago. This is the type of performance investors want to see from the entire SHLD entity and is where management can drive shareholder value via free cash flow leading to debt reduction, share buybacks, dividends, and acquisitions. Asset sales will also contribute to financial flexibility for creation of shareholder value.
As mentioned above, Kmart had a decent sales performance but with many cost savings and gross margin expansion opportunities already realized prior to the merger, flat sales won